[ SECRET POST #6250 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.
[Death Note]

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #893.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Character AI Anon from the other day

[(Anonymous)]

I'd say discussing the concept of ownership is kind of a big deal considering you want to talk about permission or lack thereof. Permission must be given by someone who can give that permission, hence why talking about ownership is important. If I, random person on the internet, were to permit you, other random anon, to write and sell novel adaptations of Star Wars, that permission would be void because I do not own that IP.

We can't talk permission if we don't talk ownership, one thing is inextricably linked to the other.

As for the comics argument, the point was that the publisher might own the rights to the characters an artist works on, but that doesn't mean the artist isn't allowed to be mad on their own behalf if someone steals their work even if it isn't their "original" work featuring their original characters.