[ SECRET POST #6278 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6278 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Baldur's Gate 3]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Adrian Edmondson and Rik Mayall, Dawn French and Jennifer Saunders, Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry, David Mitchell and Robert Webb, Sue Perkins and Mel Giedroyc]



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 06 secrets from Secret Submission Post #897.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Gareth Edwards? Really? Rogue One was hands down the best Star Wars movie of the new era and a great movie in its own right.

[(Anonymous)]

It was a good movie after reshooting a solid thirty percent of it to readd the Star Wars stuff into the Star Wars movie.

[(Anonymous)]

Nope. The ending was amazing, but the rest of the movie was amazing even without it.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not a Star Wars fan, for context. Rogue One was... eh. I think it had potential, but felt really rushed to me and Jyn Erso didn't really click with me as a protagonist. I don't get all the gushing about it, though. To me, it seems like the whole Wonder Woman thing, where the other DC movies were so crap that WW looks really, really good in comparison. But taken by itself, it's okay at best.

[(Anonymous)]

Have you talked to someone who likes it and tried to listen to them rather than deciding ahead of time that, because you personally don't like it, it could only be that it looks good in comparison?

This is the worst kind of take on a piece of media. It's so arrogant. What makes you so special that you can decide what's objectively good and bad, and anyone who disagrees with you must have less pure, more plebian reasons for their tastes?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't ask people for their opinion because I don't care very much. My opinion is equally inconsequential to them, and my lack of enthusiasm for this movie doesn't take away from their enjoyment in any way. Unless, of course, it bothers them very, very much that there's someone who doesn't like the movie they like. But that would be silly!

[(Anonymous)]

You think your opinions on films are inconsequential...but simultaneously think that if someone likes something that you don't, it isn't that the work has merit to them - it's that they've been fooled into thinking it's good due to some external factor.

People who like things that I dislike or dislike things that I do don't bother me. What bothers me is people acting as if they alone understand what's objectively good or bad, which you were clearly doing, despite your pitiful attempt here to walk it back.