[ SECRET POST #6282 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6282 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #898.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Right? I think the monarchy would rather die off/out than grovel to H&M to come back and I'd bet H&M would tell them to get bent if they did. I don't see how OPs scenario would work out, but then again, this shit is pretty crazy so who tf knows for certain.

[(Anonymous)]

I for one would LOVE the monarchy to die off.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think this is true. The monarchy has done quite a lot to avoid dying off, and I don't think Harry and Meghan are truly that reluctant-especially because their non royal attempts at making it big have largely failed to pan out. They really overestimated how much glamor and potential income was lost when they walked away.

[(Anonymous)]

They don't need Harry and Meghan back at all. Princess Anne's daughter, Zara and her husband Mike are likely to play well with the UK public as the new Face if they have to use them. And Beatrice and Eugenie have largely avoided the taint of their mum and dad's escapades. Eddie and Sophie are well liked as well. I think a lot of people would support a further change in the succession laws to move Princess Anne above Andy and Edward though, if push really came to shove, and frankly it was unfair on her, and mostly because Andy was The Queen's favourite child, that it didn't happen last time they rejigged the line of succession.

Plus they just need to limp through the next decade and Kate and Wills kids will start to age into the public roles demographic. The monarchy is going to be fine, Harry and Meghan, maybe not so much.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think there's any chance of Anne being moved above her younger brothers in the succession-- there are already two generations of Charles's family ahead of her, and the last change was made specifically to modernize things for William's children and going forward, and I don't think Anne has any interest in being the monarch. She was her mother's prop and stay for the last few years and in that CBC interview before Charles's coronation I got the sense she was energized and happy about being his right-hand woman. She's a born first lieutenant, and I mean that in the best sense.

(The funniest thing Harry has said in the last few years was an occasion a couple of years ago when he went home to visit and said he was there to check on his grandmother and make sure she was OK. I was like, Child, she has PRINCESS ANNE looking out for her. Come on!)

[(Anonymous)]

Zara seems great and all, but she's never been in that sort of role and doesn't even have a title. In fact, the whole point of that family seems to be trying to live a normal(ish), non-royal life. Do you really see that suddenly changing and her taking such a prominent role as a working royal?

Beatrice and Eugenie mostly don't get tarred with the same brush as their parents, but Prince Andrew's issues are waaaaay more serious now. IMO, the reason why they've mostly escaped that level of media intensity is because they're not working royals. If they were, I wouldn't bet that the media is going to refrain from commenting about both their parents, especially Andrew because of very obvious reasons.