case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-03-27 06:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #6291 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6291 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Baldur's Gate 3]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #899.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 10:35 am (UTC)(link)
This is sad. As a bisexual woman, the most meaningful and close relationship I've ever had with another human being is with my current girlfriend, who understands me on a level that I don't think a guy ever will. I actually believe in soulmates now thanks to her. Sorry you haven't experienced this platonically OP, you're missing out.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
That is not friendhip but a romantic relationship. You can't experience romance 'platonically'.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 11:58 am (UTC)(link)
Are you being willfully obtuse? AYRT was talking about meaningful relationships with other women, and sorry that OP hasn't experienced as meaningful a platonic one as she has a romantic one. Please learn what context is and how to take basic cues from it I'm begging

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not.
Ayrt's only meaningful relationships with other women, as you say, is with her girlfriend. She has no girl friends, only a girlfriend. Should I feel sorry for AYRT because her only meaningful relationships with other women is sexual? I think I should.

Also kudos for not resorting to calling troll. It makes me take your points more seriously even if I disagree.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

You are, cause Anon in question said "most meaningful and close". You chose to read that as "only". Go back and read it again.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
This is sad. As a bisexual woman, the most meaningful and close relationship I've ever had with another human being is with my current girlfriend, who understands me on a level that I don't think a guy ever will. I actually believe in soulmates now thanks to her. Sorry you haven't experienced this platonically OP, you're missing out.

go ahead, quote anything about friends.
AYRT is really stupid too, because of course your romantic partner is your closest person. What does it have to friends? Stupid.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You have a reading comprehension problem.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
So you can't. Jerk.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't what? Your reply makes no sense.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Looser jerk anon, hi.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
0/10 ad hominem

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you insane? I never implied I don't have female friends either, I do. I also inferred that I've dated men but never had a bond with them the way I do with my girlfriend. Seek help, my god.

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You didn't say anything about female friends. OP also didn't. You just thought OP doesn't have any. Hypocricy is your name. Are YOU insane because you think I should be able to read you mind? Or that saying that you have 0 male friends is... somehow good?

Also I feel sorry for you for never forming meaningfull relationship with men. It's so sad. I hope you manage to one day.

DA

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Still having that reading comprehension problem. Maybe you should stop replying to things until you get that fixed?

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
You're not a DA. Your are a looser 'jerk' anon.
Hi.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2024-03-28 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
0/10 ad hominem

(also DA means different anon, meaning not the one you originally responded to - anon is DA)

(Anonymous) 2024-03-29 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
What the actual fuck is wrong with you? Stop seething over nothing, you sound pathetic.