[ SECRET POST #6321 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6321 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Lark Rise to Candleford]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of underage ships]

[Five Nights at Freddy's]


































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #903.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well, yeah? Not every author is going to do every trend, but it is a trend. Saying "Authors are doing this" is known to be a shorthand for "trend". No one says that and means Every. Single. Author. On. Earth.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I'd wager that the commenter's use of just "authors" instead of something like "many authors" Can be seen as making a blanket statement about all or the vast majority of authors (especially in genre works).

[(Anonymous)]

Nah. That's just you. No one says "British people like tea" and mean every single British person. Cause there are plenty who don't. It's a shorthand.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. Qualifiers are important. If you're not making a sweeping statement about the vast majority, then use of a qualifier is advised.