case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-04-26 04:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #6321 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6321 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Lark Rise to Candleford]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of underage ships]

[Five Nights at Freddy's]


































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #903.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-27 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know. I've read a lot of shitty books from the past and I don't think they were really better than the typical shitty books of today.

I think there are two things that are really different. One, I think that people didn't really talk as much about generic crappy pulp 40 years ago or 60 years ago or 90 years ago, whereas today there's this whole new medium of communication where people talk loudly about it. I think this is basically a result of fandom culture becoming mainstream in a way that it historically was not at all. And two, I think high culture and high-end-middlebrow culture has generally collapsed in society over recent decades. But that's not really a literacy issue because it's shown up in tons of mediums. That's a broader cultural trend.