case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-04-28 03:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #6323 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6323 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Agent Elvis]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #904.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-29 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT
Single track? I think I should just make a DW account at this point because I’m not the comment OP. I’m just one of at least two different anons who will call someone out for falsely claiming that something subjectively good is objectively good, or in this case someone making some bullshit claim that something isn’t objectively bad when obviously it is.

Anyone can enjoy anything. Tastes are subjective. But it’s idiot fans like AIRT that piss me off. I’m not sure if they’re stupid or if they’re just delusional as fuck but I’ll never stop calling them out for bullshit claims.

(Anonymous) 2024-04-29 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm amused by the idea that it's possible to call something objectively good when it's actually subjectively good, but not that it's possible to call something objectively bad when it's subjectively bad.