[ SECRET POST #6326 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6326 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #904.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, have we gained the ability to film with more naturalistic lighting? Yes, technically. But if what makes it to the screen is a dark mess, it's hard to feel like we've gained anything. Because directors aren't watching their work on the kinds of TVs regular people have, we're NOT actually seeing reduced visibility because they want us to, and it's kind of a huge problem.

And I'd rather watch fakey lighting than watch a black screen.

[(Anonymous)]

*shrug* Like I said above, I've never watched something and felt like it was too dark, but I have watched a lot of stuff and thought it was way too well-lit and looked fake. So this just isn't a preference I can relate to at all.

Honestly, even if I had watched a bunch of movies where I felt the lighting was too dark, I'd still take that over fakey, too-bright lighting any day, because the latter disrupts my immersion way more than the former would.