Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-05-03 07:22 pm
[ SECRET POST #6328 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6328 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02. [SPOILERS for Civil War (2024)]

__________________________________________________
03. [SPOILERS for Ghost of Tsushima]

__________________________________________________
04. [SPOILERS for Detective Conan]
[WARNING for discussion of incest]

__________________________________________________
05. [WARNING for discussion of sex with a minor/statutory rape]

__________________________________________________
06. [WARNING for discussion of domestic violence]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #904.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-05-04 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)But assuming we're talking about the latter, non-financial category here, when evaluating whether I "feel safe" around someone, why would I put more weight on someone removing their Hogwarts house from their bio or swearing off HP fic over things like: is this person trans; does this person advocate for trans people in their workplaces; does this person volunteer for or donate to trans activist groups; does this person donate to funds for trans people's surgery; does this person put a trans rights flag in their bio or wear a pin; does this person reblog humanizing and educational resources about trans people; is this person a good friend to the trans people in their life; etc. Why the heck would someone's feelings on Harry Potter (the work of fiction) trump their actual identity, behavior, or allyship/advocacy when I'm trying to evaluate how much they care about real world minorities?
Second, I don't even think making people feel safe should be a goal I value very highly. Now don't get me wrong. I WOULD like every one of my trans friends to feel safe around me; even more, I would like them to live in a world where they can actually BE safe, where they don't have to worry about who they can trust and who they can't. So I do care about whether people feel safe and I am never going to go out of my way to make someone feel scared, anxious, or unsafe, and if there's anything simple I can do to make them feel safer, I will do it.
But also: I am just not a dangerous person and if someone thinks I am, then I don't really think that's worth my time correcting. I can't really control whether someone (especially someone on the internet) THINKS I am an unsafe person or not; it's not something I can change just by changing my own behavior because ultimately, if someone thinks I am unsafe, that is their own choice and I don't have a say in it. So while I care about feelings of safety, I am not going to stake my sense of self or my behavior on other people's feelings of safety, and I don't think anyone else should either.
Especially because a lot of people use "I feel unsafe" as a way to control other people's behavior and harm other people through exaggerated claims of danger and unsafety (ironically, a HUGE part of the anti-trans campaigns right now is using feelings of unsafety to justify denying trans women the right to access resources and spaces normally made available to women). A person ALWAYS has the option to say that they "feel unsafe" around someone. Are they ACTUALLY unsafe is what people should care about. Feelings of safety in fandom are important, but there are way too many exaggerated claims of harm (which go on to be used to justify inflicting harm on other people) for me to prioritize them above actual concrete harms. Is someone with a Hogwarts house in their bio actually spreading transphobic disinformation, supporting transphobic legislation in their offline lives, rationalizing JKR's transphobia, or behaving demonstrably callously towards trans people in their social circles? Or are you assuming they do because they still participate in Harry Potter fandom? People can have very different relationships to Harry Potter even while being dismayed at what JKR continues to do with her Harry Potter money.
(I mean... even the monetary argument is a bit iffy to me, because JKR ALREADY made her Harry Potter money. It's very difficult to spend a billion dollars over a lifetime -- she's going to be rich and funding transphobic causes left and right for the rest of her life regardless of what people do right now. I absolutely do understand feeling "dirty" for financially benefiting her in any way and I personally can't bring myself to support her, but also I am just not a big Harry Potter fan; I am making very little sacrifice by boycotting everything she's involved in. But if I were a big fan, I still think I would feel much less guilty about adding a drop to JKR's already extremely sizable funds than I would in failing to support trans causes in other ways.)