[ SECRET POST #6337 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6337 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #906.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Age Gap Question

[(Anonymous)]

Sure, but who is the one to judge how many views contrary to an ideology a person may have before they're not deemed "part of this ideology" anymore? Because in a lot of other areas, the pro-censorship antis are leftists, and radical ones at that quite often.

Re: Age Gap Question

[(Anonymous)]

I would say if the majority of a person's views are contrary to the ideology they claim to have, then they aren't really part of it. I'd further say that, insofar as we're able to identify the core tenets of an ideology, someone who fundamentally disagrees with said tenets does not belong to it, regardless how many overlapping tertiary views they may have.

An ideology with no bounds around it is basically useless as a descriptive category. What does it mean to be a leftist if, say, someone who views taxation as theft and wants to privatize all government services can claim the label just as easily as a person who wants greater socialization of services?