case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-07-11 05:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #6397 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6397 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #914.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-07-12 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt but self-reflection is not victim-blamey. It's just evaluating the situation and any patterns you may have fallen into.

If you're not remotely open to whatever role you might be playing in all of it (even subconsciously), how do you expect anything to get better?

(Anonymous) 2024-07-12 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
Self-reflection is a good idea. But implying that the women who bring up issues like this with the men they've dated is all their own fault isn't, nor is that encouraging self-reflection and identifying harmful patterns. It's just victim blaming.

(Anonymous) 2024-07-12 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
You need to re-read that post. That's not what the anon said at all.

If you have a pattern of dating the same type of guy who turns out to be a jerk, and all you conclude from that is that "all men must be jerks," then that is in fact an absence of self-reflection.