[ SECRET POST #6425 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6425 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Disney's Mulan]



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #918.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Doesn't really change the point.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think this is making the point you think it's making, though. The original comment says that pheromones as OP describes them probably don't exist... OR that scents and biochemical markers may exist that cause or spark attraction (there's already interesting research into this and what attracts people to what scents or what people carry what chemicals in their immune system) but likely have to be tailored to people as opposed to secret OP's idea of a universal 'woman' pheromone that attracts (straight) men.

Flying machines happened, but not in the way the ancient people imagined them; pheromones may exist, but not in the way OP and most people imagine they do or work; how does this example not only support the original point?

[(Anonymous)]

Because central to OP's point is the idea that the length of time it takes to discover something is itself evidence of whether or not it exists. And that's simply not true.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't see anything like that in the secret?

[(Anonymous)]

Ugh, I messed up. I was referring to the anon at the top of the thread, not to the maker of the secret.