[ SECRET POST #6449 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6449 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Ciconia: When They Cry]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Snowpiercer]



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #922.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

da

[(Anonymous)]

I would read the blurb on the inside leaf and/or the first page and if it grabbed me, yeah I would read it. I'm not gonna just skip a book because it has an author photo. That is as random to me as skipping because the cover is yellow.

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure OP is talking about books that don't have a blub at all. I don't think it's the author photo OP objects to, but the prioritizing of the author's photo over actually giving potential readers any information about the book. Which I agree with OP about, presuming that's what they meant. I don't really care about the author photo one way or the other, but giving me zero information about the book definitely makes me less likely to give it a chance.