Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-09-02 06:06 pm
[ SECRET POST #6450 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6450 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #922.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)I know they’re often characters that are there for comedy purposes, but I just have a hard time enjoying the joke when I can’t help imagining having to deal with someone like them in real life.
I wish I could let go of that and get in on the joke, but it’s just too close to home right now.
Re: Question for the comm
Anti-heroes in general, though sometimes there will be one I like.
Basically any "hero" who is a villain in all but name but because they are a "hero" canon ignores their flaws.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 02:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)Honestly mostly meta things. When they get obvious plot armor. Or the author is heavy-handed in how they totally were justified even if they did horrible things. When the author's vision of the character is something completely different from what I am perceiving on screen or in text.
e.g. I don't hate this character for being a piece of shit, lots of characters are glorious and funny and interesting pieces of shit. I hate it because the author and the fictional world the author created keeps insisting it's not a piece of shit when it is one, and that's grating.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)Just keep the meta aspect clean and we're good.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Meta: when they're obviously the creator's pet, when they're blatant author inserts or obvious soapbox characters for the author's opinions.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 03:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)The "asshole with a heart of gold" type of characters. Where they are all jerky mcjerkerton but they are secretly a wounded woobie so we should excuse all of their jerky actions and words.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-02 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 12:07 am (UTC)(link)Millionaires are eh hit or miss. Lots of idk doctors are millionaires.
Billionaires unless something exceptional better be at least some flavor of evil because how could they not be?
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) - 2024-09-03 02:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 02:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) - 2024-09-03 05:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 12:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 01:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 03:08 am (UTC)(link)The biggest one is when the narrative insists that a good guy protag is a moral paragon, but the character's actions demonstrate the exact opposite. For example, the designated good guy acting like a hypocrite, being awful to his allies, or bullying another character for no reason and the narrative doesn't call the character on that shit. If the behavior I don't like is a pattern rather than a one-off, I find it impossible to ignore, and end up hating that character.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 02:26 am (UTC)(link)But honestly, a lot of it is in the writing. A really compellingly written character makes a lot of difference, it's just hard for most writers to pull off.
Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 04:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 06:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question for the comm
(Anonymous) 2024-09-03 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)It gets pretty creepy fast. It's like they've gone beyond pretending that their shit doesn't stink to having convinced themselves that it actively can't.