[ SECRET POST #6466 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6466 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #924.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I honestly can't think of any TV show with shorter seasons that I like that I'd be okay with them cutting seventy to eighty-five percent of the content. (Stanger Things season 1 with 8 episodes = 398 minutes and Stanger Things season 4 with 9 episodes = 778 minutes, for reference).

[(Anonymous)]

And Stranger Things season 4 had a couple of episodes that were movie length all on their own. Had they all been the traditional length, it would have been a 13- or 14-episode season.

[(Anonymous)]

Same. If I get bored in the middle of a season, I'm outta there. If I need to know how the season ends, I'll just read recaps and put it out my mind.

[(Anonymous)]

I mostly agree with OP but do think there are exceptions, like Stranger Things. The issue I have is that most shows suck now. Like, really suck. They have an interesting premise but fail in every other way, usually because that premise isn’t fleshed out enough to cover 10 hours let alone 30, the characters aren’t fleshed out enough to hold audience interest over that same time, and the shows lack a direction or goal. Making those into movies instead would result in more interesting things to watch.