case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-10-02 06:24 pm

[ SECRET POST #6480 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6480 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Rings of Power]



__________________________________________________



06.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #926.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-10-03 09:59 am (UTC)(link)
On the fandom side, there was a big thing a few years ago where a lot of the BNFs of the otome game fandom made posts felt that it was very important to "clear it up" for people that a game can only be otome if all of the love interests are male (or if there's a female route it's platonic like in Mystic Messenger). If it has even one romanceable girl, it was not an otome! Oh of course they had nothing against games where you could romance a girl, you just need to call them romance games, hands off our otome label you filthy gays UH WAIT I-I-I mean we have nothing against that really just don't call your game otome!!!

Lots of long posts about how it's just simple history; all the games that defined the genre had all male love interests. No reflection on why that would have been, given when they were made (hmm, big mystery there!) and why that could possibly change.