[ SECRET POST #6491 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6491 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #928.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That's only if you assume that the authors are infallible in being self-aware of their own writing tics and tells and therefore if they say they can't tell, then nobody can. I don't think that's an ironclad assumption. If authors were that infallible, they wouldn't need editors.

[(Anonymous)]

Of course, secret!OP was saying that they could tell that Pratchett came up with the whole idea and then Gaiman ruined it all with his Gaiman-ness, not that there are random writing tics in certain sections. But ignore that!

[(Anonymous)]

...no?

The secret said Pratchett had "some good ideas" in the book that got warped by Gaiman into Gaiman-ness, with the implication that maybe those ideas would have been better off as a standalone book. Nobody said the whole thing was Pratchett's idea, or that Gaiman didn't add ideas of his own.

The only mention of "whole idea" in this thread or the secret is you.