Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-11-10 04:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #6519 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6519 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #932.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-10 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)It's more the constant victim poor little innocent woobie angelblob who only knows how to love and cry thing that bores me to death.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-10 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 01:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 04:31 am (UTC)(link)On the one hand, I'm with you. I prefer cold and angry female characters -- or, at the very least, "not nice" female characters.
On the other hand... "Nice" female characters get hate for feeding into stereotypes about femininity; and "not nice" female characters get hate for, well, being not nice! Female characters that fall somewhere in the middle tend to get dragged by fanon into one extreme or the other, which then gets used as justification for fans' hatred of them.
So, here's how I feel. People, in general, hold female characters to higher standards than they hold male ones; and all things being equal, would rather an MC be male. They'll tie themselves in knots explaining how the issue they have with all female characters definitely isn't their femaleness, and how it's actually very feminist to prefer all male casts. But ultimately, they're fooling themselves. The simple truth is that neither men nor women like women.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 06:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 07:09 am (UTC)(link)But give me stoic, aloof female characters and kind, nurturing male characters any day.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 07:38 am (UTC)(link)Yes, this exactly.
Also nice kind character can be interesting if written right. Her struggle, her active choice, her occasional pettiness and frustration. But you can rarely see it
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)I fully accept that I am old and bitter about this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 05:44 am (UTC)(link)It's why even though I adored the Wonder Woman movie, I felt Black Panther was even more innovative in its female characters. Wonder Woman is great but it still had one woman in a sea of dudes, whereas Black Panther had several wonderful female characters. By virtue of :gasp: having more than one female character, the women of Black Panther are able to breathe a little and demonstrate more personality, since they're not burdened with having to represent half the population.
And of course, Birds of Prey was even better in that the women had top billing and didn't have to share with a man. I just remember walking out of the theater after seeing that movie, feeling so pumped, like I could do anything, found myself wondering if this was how guys felt all the time.
Though seriously, that's what leads to good representation: more of it. Just keep flooding the market with marginalized characters. Stuff franchises to the bursting with people of all shapes, sizes, colors, genders, and orientations. That's how we get better representation, simply by creating more content. It's why when a male hero fails, no one really bats an eye because there are dozens upon dozens of other characters for guys to choose from. If we get to that point with marginalized groups, it'd be great. No one would have to throw a hissy over terrible representation for this marginalized group, because there would be many many more for members of said marginalized group to choose from.
Though for all the faults of Tolkien, Lord of the Rings is like the best when it comes to male characters. Whenever anyone talks about toxic masculinity, rightwingers have two responses: 1) that we accuse all men of being toxic and 2) Okay, so what is positive masculinity anyway? Whenever anyone asks that second question, you can point them towards LOTR. Nearly every male character, save for evil or corrupted ones, is an exemplar of positive masculinity: brave and loyal, but also kind and caring, willing to cry and admit to their fears/weaknesses.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 05:53 am (UTC)(link)I can like characters like that if we can see the exact process of how they go through awful things and stay nice, but the writing must make me buy that it's possible and show them struggle to do it. If the hardships are all just backstory we don't witness and all we see is the soft nice person they are now, get your praise outta here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 06:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 06:55 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2024-11-11 09:41 am (UTC)(link)I agree with an upthread comment that in general we need more female representation so we don't cherry pick every female character apart and instead see a wide variety of characters with varying personalities.