[ SECRET POST #6536 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6536 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Xenoblade Chronicles 3]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #934.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

thanks for being a shitstain and misgendering a character on purpose again

[(Anonymous)]

won't someone think on pixels?

[(Anonymous)]

DA
You know this is more than about pixels, stop being willfully stupid.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT: I have never seen a character complaining about pronouns. No, the kid of "Assigned Male" doesn't count because is a copypasta of the author so of course she could write the character complaing (hell, most of the comics are like that). So yes, is about pixels.

[thewakokid]

Well I could point out the fact that it was an error, that even tho I think of the character as she I recognise thats not the proper term for this fictional character as written.

At this point if it were a real person I would probably apologise... Hell, If I thought you were legitimately upset by the slip I would still apologise... Hell, even knowing this is just a sad loser demanding a performance as a display of power, you STILL might have been able to make me comply if you hadn't come at me like a bitter troll...

All that said, I know who you are and as much as I appreciate your devotion to me, I must invite you to toss my salad.

[(Anonymous)]

Hi

As an enby ho is also sick of people like you misgendering characters and not apologizing or coming up with reasons to NOT apologize (sad loser? really?), kindly fuck off into the sea and do not return.

[(Anonymous)]

The anon who has a hate boner for wako is a sad loser though, no two ways about it.

[thewakokid]

You're free to be upset with me for whatever reason makes you most happy, in this case because you imagine that in different circumstances I would be just as obstinate?

But I invite you to re-read the section where I use the term "sad loser" and the type of person I describe:

A known troll who is demanding a performance of an apology as a display of power. Sounds like a sad loser to me. Yes really

If you feel my slip up in the gender of a fictional character gives you grounds to expect a personal apology, I'll hear your case and decide my reply to YOU separate to my more general reply to my fan club,

[(Anonymous)]

It's you assuming everyone who's mad at you for a "slip up" that happens consistently (in the same breath where you say they're mean to their overbearing and controlling mother who borderline abused them in the name of protecting them, constantly reminding them they were never good enough for her--sorry that doesn't get kindness and anything but the default respect every person gets in my book) is a troll.

[(Anonymous)]

>everyone who's mad at you
Who is "everyone"? just the first anon who replied and... that is?

[thewakokid]

That's one helluva run-on sentence. Let me see if I can make some sense of this:

"It's you assuming everyone who's mad at you for a "slip up" that happens consistently is a troll."

Nope. As far as I'm aware, this is my first slip up. And this guys IS a troll. A very specific troll.

"In the same breath where you say they're mean to their overbearing and controlling mother"

They are.

"who borderline abused them in the name of protecting them, constantly reminding them they were never good enough for her"

LOL no. No, that might be a touch of projection on your part. It's certainly projection on the part of the writer who keeps IMPLYING the mother is unkind, but never shows anything other than basic motherly concern, and at one point mild confusion over an identity that Taash themself didn't know existed at the start of the game.

Also "Abusive" is far too often overused, abuse is not just "A thing that upsets you"

[(Anonymous)]

Mommy Dearest forced her child to do religious practices to the point the child missed breakfast many times because their hands were too big to tie the fucking ropes quickly--which is textbook abuse. Mommy Dearest OUTRIGHT ADMITS she was a terrible mother. She misgenders you if you play a trans character yourself (was playing a trans woman, Mommy said "Taash doesn't usually go for men" so IDK how I'm supposed to take that other than my trans woman isn't a valid woman in her eyes) and she consistently pushes sexist ideals onto her child under the banner or protection--just like all those lovely anti-vax Mumsnet moms who think autism is worse than the diseases vaccines cause.

[thewakokid]

That's all pretty warped, If this isn't you just stubbornly clinging to a point you can't back up, you might have some personal issues colouring your interpretation here.

[(Anonymous)]

It's not. It's in the game. The ropes bit is even early on in Taash's conversations. So are the sexist tasks. So is the misgendering. Like, they're not that deep in.

[thewakokid]

No, but your READ of them is. You're taking some big old leaps.

[(Anonymous)]

Jeez. You're so full of yourself. They were just saying it like it is, not demanding anything. Eveybody knows who the troll and the sad loser are here.

[thewakokid]

They do. Its really not hard to identify this dude.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt - I am NOT the person who usually has a go at you. I am another non-binary person who is sick of shit about this character and, yeah, not gonna lie, sick of you and your constant 'slipups'. Seriously, you think only one person in this whole comm is sick of you and your schtick? Get real.

[thewakokid]

See, I don't believe I've ever spoken about a trans or non-binary person before on this comm, so that would have to mean that there is more than one person who is sick of my schtick AND has convinced themself that I am constantly talking about and misgendering trans people. THAT is what seems unlikely. Multiple people hating me? Fine. Multiple people with the exact same delusion about me? Less believable.