case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-12-09 06:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #6548 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6548 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Dungeons and Daddies]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #936.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-12-10 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)

OP actively calling themself an anti is stupid imo, but people insisting that they're "actually proship" for simply not being pro-harassment is stupider, and not even just on the "stop trying to make people take on labels they don't want to take on" level.

OP's "moral objection" to "problematic" ships is contrary to what being proship is supposed to be about, and the fact that they think online harassment is not a useful response doesn't make them proship.

(Anonymous) 2024-12-10 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Nobody "insisted" OP was proship. All of one person suggested that perhaps OP consider they might be. The majority suggested OP have their stance without calling themselves anti.