Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2024-12-19 07:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #6558 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6558 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 06 secrets from Secret Submission Post #937.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 01:28 am (UTC)(link)LJ was on a downhill slide and the plans the company had were awful and not what a lot of the fandom userbase wanted. There were so many posts of discussions on where to go and DW was still invite only I believe. Plus there was a chunk of people that had beef with some of the creators of DW. That and tumblr was a big draw with gifs and photos and generally a lot more low effort posting.
So you are partly right, LJ lost the spark due to the owners changing things up (and the strikethroughs and ddos attacks etc) and tumblr was right there waiting. But I think there was just a lot of upheaval in fandom and the internet at large during the time too.
And now fandom has changed so much I can't see it ever changing back to the more LJ style. Which is a shame because I think you had better actual discussions and circles and friends there, but it could just be that I am very biased with my own fun times during the LJ heydays.
Re: No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 01:54 am (UTC)(link)I also wish that the fandom at large would revert back to journal sites. I let people know DW exists anytime it's relevant to what they want.
Re: No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 03:19 am (UTC)(link)I feel like on DW, people haven't managed to establish the same trust and expectation that if they say something vulnerable, most of the people hearing what they say will understand them (or at least not judge them), and so the perception is that the "safe" level of conversation is also a fairly impersonal one.
Re: No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 02:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 04:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 04:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: No, it was the Russians.
(Anonymous) 2024-12-20 08:24 am (UTC)(link)