case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-12-30 05:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #6569 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6569 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #939.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The underground railroad, for women.

(Anonymous) 2024-12-31 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I think the original suggestion was kind of naive, but I think you're overstating your criticism by claiming they're 17 and want to burn the existing shelter system to the ground. I don't know of any shelter system that would even be inconvenienced, let alone destroyed, by some of the people who used to need their services being able to go somewhere else.

Re: The underground railroad, for women.

(Anonymous) 2024-12-31 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It's the kind of rhetoric I see a lot. Young and/or niave people who want to solve a problem that's So Obvious and So Easy. If Only Everyone Would Just ect.

Meanwhile they've done zero research into what's out there or what people need. And then you point out that animal shelters or homeless shelters or soup kitchens or warming stations already exist and NO! those have some flaw. And supporting an imperfect system is basically a sin. Better to do nothing but dream of perfection. I no more know that op is 17 than I know op is the personification of Uber. But they sound the same. Same vibes.

And yes, no shelter system would be destroyed by an alternative existing. Unless we took away the funding for existing shelters and put it toward a decentralized system acting in secret in private homes. I invision something like the change from orphanages to foster homes. I can't say that it would be better or worse.

Re: The underground railroad, for women.

(Anonymous) 2025-01-01 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Ah. I don't have anything to add, but that does clarify for me why you were annoyed.