case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-01-01 07:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #6571 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6571 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #939.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-01-02 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
This is just "if you write about it in fiction you support it in real life" dressed up with a little bit more of a spin to disguise its simplistic and flawed nature. Like so:

"A character who is a good person had bad things happen to them and that means the author hates good people."

vs.

"A character who is a good person had bad things happen to them and it was supported by the narrative and that means the author hates good people."

And that's why I no longer trust the phrase "supported/condoned by the narrative." You can turn the reading around in your head to make the narrative support or condemn anything your knowledge of the author tells you they support or condemn, or that you simply want to believe they do because you don't like them.