[ SECRET POST #6572 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6572 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 06 secrets from Secret Submission Post #939.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Original works you read/saw *after* seeing an adaptation

[(Anonymous)]

I saw Stanley Kubrick's Shining movie before I read King's novel.

I was surprised by how much was left out, then realized a lot of what was left out wouldn't translate easily to movie narrative, and then came to accept both on their own terms (though they really should have revived the "Inspired By" credit for the Kubrick film!).

Re: Original works you read/saw *after* seeing an adaptation

[(Anonymous)]

Same, and I like both but they are very different things!

Re: Original works you read/saw *after* seeing an adaptation

[greghousesgf]

Stephen King himself said something to the effect that "it's a very good horror movie that has nothing to do with my book"