Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2025-01-02 05:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #6572 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6572 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 06 secrets from Secret Submission Post #939.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Original works you read/saw *after* seeing an adaptation
(Anonymous) 2025-01-03 03:20 am (UTC)(link)Krabat, after coming across the film version and then reading comments about the movie where people pointed out that the movie is very scaled-down in comparison to the book. And kind of sensationalized. In that case, I don't regret it either, though, because getting a copy of the book in my country took quite a bit of initiative on my part, and I probably wouldn't have been motivated enough to seek it out, otherwise. I wouldn't have known how much I wanted to read it.
The Jungle Books (1 & 2), after Disney's animated version of the first one. Hm, in that case, my opinion of the movie went down considerably, even though I liked their version of Shere Khan and Kaa quite a lot, because the book was just so much richer and more complicated. And some of the drama in the second jungle book was phenomenal: the war Mowgli orchestrates on behalf of the wolves against the red dogs and the way Kaa helps him enlist the unwitting aid of the great bee colonies. Utterly bewitching. I don't understand why there haven't been more (serious) adaptations of the second Jungle Book.
I owe the original miniseries version of Shogun for my ever reading Clavell's book, too. Both were boundary-pushing in different mediums, and because I didn't have a lot of background in historical Japanese fiction, watching the show and reading the book almost felt like different experiences: the book added a LOT of cultural background, but the tv version had beautiful sets and outstanding acting.
On the other hand, I tried to read Pippi Longstocking after seeing some of the 1969 tv series with Inger Nilsson, and it seemed kind of limited, zany, and aimed-at-younger-children, in comparison? I had to read it in translation, though, so it may have been censored or tampered with. I just remember the live action version as having serious parts and real danger, (though obviously a girl who could pick up and launch a full-sized airplane with her bare hands couldn't help but be fantasy) and was let down by how random and harmless her adventures seemed in the books - when I finally came across the books.