case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-01-15 07:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #6585 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6585 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Stardew Valley]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #940.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-01-16 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I did on one about oh, 3 weeks ago or so, but it was definitely the first/only one in at least a year. And I complained because this secret is wrong: it was unreadable and had no context clues to help figure out what it was even saying. A letter or two is fine if weird from a design perspective but crucial nouns and/or verbs up to half a sentence here and there? Nah.

(Anonymous) 2025-01-16 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Yeah I remember one about some sort of anime series? Where all the comments were like "we have no idea what this is saying"

Context clues didn't help anyone parse things when the key words were covered

(Anonymous) 2025-01-16 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no context clues are going to help when it's missing half of a secret.
Also I don't understand why we should bother at all

(Anonymous) 2025-01-16 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
I remember one that had beads or something draped all over the text and seemed completely unrelated to the actual secret.