case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-01-30 07:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #6600 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6600 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #943.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-01-31 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
If something on a mass-review site has 3 or less stars, I assume it must be pretty bad because the organic terrible ratings managed to outweigh the 4-5s farmed by marketing campaigns and bots.

I know review bombing campaigns happen, so if I was particularly interested in something that's badly reviewed I'd still click through to see what the bad reviews are actually saying e.g. obvious review bombs by homophobes crying about gay characters existing mean I ignore the rating and read it anyway. But it usually isn't that.