case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-02-01 03:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #6602 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6602 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #944.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

On a Method of Dismantling Misinformation

(Anonymous) 2025-02-01 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I was reading this piece on logic checking in Skeptical Inquirer and figured I'd share it. I admit it's a bit of a dense read, but there are useful diagrams for how to engage in logic checking and seeing the different groups of logical fallacies out there.

https://skepticalinquirer.org/2024/12/the-cranky-uncle-game-a-way-to-logic-check-misinformation-about-climate-change/

Re: On a Method of Dismantling Misinformation

(Anonymous) 2025-02-01 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Neat read.

Re: On a Method of Dismantling Misinformation

(Anonymous) 2025-02-01 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
can you teal deer it?

Re: On a Method of Dismantling Misinformation

(Anonymous) 2025-02-01 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
OP

When dealing with misinformation, trying bringing up the logical fallacy used first for debunking and then dive into the specific misinformation itself. There is an online game available to help people learn and quickly identify fallacies so debunking bad logic can be done more quickly.

That might be a bit too teal deer, but it's a start at least.