case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-06-08 03:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #6729 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6729 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.
[The legend of Zelda]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #963..
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: AO3 Vent/question about the Underage Sex warning

(Anonymous) 2025-06-09 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
And here I thought Sweden was supposed to be one of the enlightened countries where they understand that crimes with no victim aren't crimes at all. So much for that lmao. Sorry about your predicament nonny.

Re: AO3 Vent/question about the Underage Sex warning

(Anonymous) 2025-06-09 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Mmhm. I was less than amused to hear from representatives of the AO3 in the post where they announced they were retroactively re-naming the Underage tag "Underage Sex" that they were doing that to cater to the delicate sensibilities of a then-recent law proclaiming it illegal to read about fictional minors having equally fictional sex in Canada.

And then in March of this year, a woman who published a dark erotica novel in Australia was arrested and had her real name plastered all over the news because they're charging her with possessing / disseminating / producing child abuse material. Solely for having written a tasteless but awfully tame-looking story about an 18-year old dating a man who'd lusted over her since she was a child.

A bunch of countries that used to demand international recognition for not persecuting people for reading fiction (and as you say - present themselves as enlightened for it), have recently either passed or narrowly defeated laws that do just that. Just in the past couple of years.

Re: AO3 Vent/question about the Underage Sex warning

(Anonymous) 2025-06-09 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Above is NAYRT, if that wasn't clear, but I'm glad someone brought up the point that you just did.

Re: AO3 Vent/question about the Underage Sex warning

(Anonymous) 2025-06-09 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
It was made illegal through a supreme court case about 15 years ago.

AYRT

Re: AO3 Vent/question about the Underage Sex warning

(Anonymous) 2025-06-09 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Time to revisit that.

Re: AO3 Vent/question about the Underage Sex warning

(Anonymous) 2025-06-09 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I know right? That's so much scarier than the censorship I'm currently dreading. They're fictional, they're made up, how the fuck do you ask them for ID????