[ SECRET POST #6734 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6734 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Warehouse 13]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04. [OP warned for a graphic sex scene (but I don't think it's dub/noncon or anything)]




__________________________________________________



05.
[How I Met Your Mother]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Amanda Palmer]



__________________________________________________



















07. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]




__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of JKR/transphobia/etc]




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #963..
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[bannedbookweek]

Please say "psych" anon

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT I'm empathizing with an OP who thinks a character (that I'm assuming is a villain) is relatable because said character's angry at humans repeating the same dumb-cruel behaviors for 100 years, and they want to end the world.

I'm also trying to point out that I think it's still arrogant and unjustified, on anyone's part, to decide life isn't worth it *for other people.* Which this character is presumably doing.

I thought the logical flaws might be more obvious if I took human lives out of the equation, and pointed out that some of the people trying to dream up "a world without suffering" for animals, have gone off the rails because they think they have the right to judge nature and force it to fit their prejudice. And that, if it can't be railroaded into what they think the "correct" shape would be, it shouldn't exist at all.

Do you see the parallel?

[bannedbookweek]

Sorry I just meant that your second paragraph is fucking terrifying. Like I agree with what you're seeing but "after the existential shock that was finding vegans online who think 1. all carnivorous animals should be forcibly "evolved" with human technology into being able to survive on plants, or 2. if that's not possible, they should all be killed to prevent them from traumatizing and eating the poor herbivores (because predation is deeply upsetting to humans), and should be eradicated everywhere" is not something I expected to discover

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT Oh. Me neither!

You're making me feel less silly for being like "o_O" about that for a while, afterwards. Because I definitely was. So, thanks for that.