[ SECRET POST #6746 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6746 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Gargoyles]



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #965.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: “Red flag” recommendations

[iff_and_xor]

The question is whether you get on fine with people who recommend you media that is clearly against your tastes as they would be aware of them (or as you’d hope they’d be aware of them).

Re: “Red flag” recommendations

[(Anonymous)]

I get that, and I apologize for letting my emotions get away from me due to other anons. Your conversation starter was worded diplomatically (more than the secret), and I appreciate people (especially named users) keeping GCs alive. And goodness, it must be upsetting indeed to have someone rec something to you that feels like a personal insult.

We get secrets from time to time that amount to "if you like XYZ, I judge you and could never get along with you." Which is how the secret struck me, and that's a strange way of thinking to me. E.g. the other anon who replied to me likening media tastes to social compatibility. Or those here basically amounting an appreciation for Fight Club to utter deviance that calls for immediate dismissal of the person as likeable in any way. It wasn't your post that got under my skin, more the comments. Again, I apologize if that felt like an attack on you or your post. I understand your POV.