[ SECRET POST #6794 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6794 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #972.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think the problem for me is that, as far as I can tell, what people count as "overt feminine traits" is incredibly broad and seems to include any indication that a woman has emotional range or interest in other people. Characters that I see as rather masculine (strong, physical, assertive and sometimes aggressive, brash, disagreeable, reserved, unconcerned with appearance, interested in masculine-coded pursuits, etc) are considered to still be feminine because...they don't have short enough hair (long hair can be masculine), or they have a romantic/sexual interest (romantic/sexual interest can be masculine), or they express an emotion other than anger (men fucking love people and they cry!).

The bar, as far as I can tell, is so high as to be unclearable. Like, I know real-life masculine women. I know butch lesbians, who work in construction and hang out with mostly guys. They do not meet fandom's criteria. They all have something about them that is "feminine." And this makes me think, honestly, with no shade to you, that this is ultimately about larger cultural attitudes toward women as a class than it is about masc vs fem. We are never, ever, ever good enough.