[ SECRET POST #6849 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6849 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #978.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

As a queer agender person, this argument is a huge cope. There's nothing wrong with transcanons, but they often are literally adding onto or changing what we assume a character is.

If a character is a girl, and I headcanon her as a trans girl, I'm going to gave to tag my fic with [trans!character] because it's my transformative interpretation. I can claim that we never saw her as a child or nude as proof she's a canon trans girl all I want, but that doesn't change most creators write cis-as-default and she is not stated to be a trsns girl. My headcanon is still valid since it's not explicitly denied, but that doesn't make it textual.