case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-10-07 05:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #6850 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6850 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


02.






__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Rayman]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 23 secrets from Secret Submission Post #978.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2025-10-07 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I read a furry porn comic where the reptiles didn’t have boobs. The mods insisted it be tagged as loli because flat chest = underage. I don’t begrudge anyone who refuses to deal with that bullshit.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Sounds Australian?

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Snilk

Also imagining a world where birds are the dominant species and drawing pictures of evolved apes with big old honkin' beaks because they can't be sexy without them, of course they'd have them
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2025-10-07 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
One of the Disney comics artists—I forget which one—said that after years and years of drawing all his women with duck bills, he couldn’t stop even when he was drawing horny art on his own time.

Transcript

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Transcript:

I don't mind most furry stuff.

I can't stand when people give avians and reptiles boobs, though. Why? What sense does that make? What are they going to use them for? What is a baby snake or bird going to do with a boob besides be very confused?

It's like putting boobs on a refrigerator because you need to make it sexy. Which, if that's your thing, well you do you, but you have to admit the level of impractical shoehorning is higher than mammaries on a mammal

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
If boobs bother you? You should also complain about them talking, having thumbs, wearing clothes, etc

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Not sure if you genuinely don't understand or are just being obtuse on purpose.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
There seems to be a big difference between having a bird talk, and giving a bird a human penis and balls. But I mean, if it's the same thing to you... okay

(Anonymous) 2025-10-07 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Furries aren't animal characters. They're humans with an animal aesthetic slapped on

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
You seem unfamiliar with the furry fandom, honestly. I'm not a furry myself but even I know it spans a huge range and most of it is somewhere in between those things, and anthros are certainly not defined as humans with fur tacked on

If you're convinced, though, nothing we can do about it
greghousesgf: (pic#17096883)

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2025-10-08 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
All this reminds me of is that scene in the Last Temptation of Christ where the talking snake says "look at my breasts" to Jesus. I have to admit I started laughing and my friend got mad.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Yep, I draw and do character design as a side gig and I always draw my oviparous anthro ladies without boobs and nipples. It just doesn't make sense and I think it's kind of boring to get the characters too similar to humans without taking count of their environmental characteristics.
The fun part of doing anthros is getting to study different animals and adapt their quirks to the basic form of humans.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
But birds do have boobs. They're not for feeding young, but for flight...and nuggies

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
If anything, they're tasty propellor axles

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 05:56 am (UTC)(link)
chicken breast is not boob. it's muscle. meat is muscle. you're eating pecs.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
Counterpoint: Chickens (and all birds) very much do have breasts. Just not nipples

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 06:44 am (UTC)(link)
Not mammalian breasts, which this is about.

(Anonymous) 2025-10-08 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)
what a strange comment. obviously they have breast and when anthropomorphised they should have a very "ample" breast compared to their body (as do birds, after all), but not boobs and nipples like mammals. And, most of all, no difference between female and male breast size, which is the thing this secrets is about after all.