case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-11-23 02:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #6897 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6897 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Mel Brooks]



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #985.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2025-11-23 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, just the other day there was a secret about Sydney Sweeney, and a good two-thirds of the commenters pointed out that they only knew who she was because of all the outrage over her jeans advert and how she was "suddenly everywhere".

Things being in tabloids (or the modern internet viral 'news' equivalent) has always meant people end up talking about it. That's how that particular form of "news" has remained as lucrative and popular as it is.

(Anonymous) 2025-11-23 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
People who do not follow the lottery at all do hear about the billion dollar jackpots when they happen, yeah. That doesn't mean people normally talk excitedly about the powerball at work a lot.

Big ridiculous things do get talked about, as big ridiculous things. But if a coworker started randomly telling others, or asking people of their moral judgements of celebrities as people apropos of nothing that would be super awkward.