case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2025-11-30 02:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #6904 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6904 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[One Piece]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #986.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Defining “adaptation”

(Anonymous) 2025-11-30 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT.

To echo the other anon, yeah it really is an adaptation even if it isn't a good one, like it literally adapts actual ACD books. Again: not well but that doesn't stop it from being an adaptation.

It uses far more than just the character names for it to be a homage, it just tries to import the canon into a modern setting, but that doesn't make it not an adaptation. Things like Psych and House are homages as they take inspiration from Holmes but aren't trying to do a full on adaptation which Sherlock absolutely was.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Defining “adaptation”

[personal profile] philstar22 2025-12-01 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Okay. Not an opinion I'm that invested in, and I haven't watched much of the show. Just was stating the impression I had from what I had watched.