[ SECRET POST #6967 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6967 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #995.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

04. https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/fc187a0e75b3.png

Transcript by OP

[fscom]

I love villains. But the instant we're supposed to root for a villain or a villainous character just because there is someone more evil, I lose interest. Darth Maul in Episode 1? Yes, please. Darth Maul coming back as a crime lord? No thank you.

[(Anonymous)]

I guess I’m kind of the opposite. I love a villainous character who’s a bit less evil or just more intelligent and pragmatic than the Bigger Bad.

If the story feels like it’s trying to whitewash them, that’s another thing. But I’m a sucker for “lesser of two evils”.

[(Anonymous)]

I can find the switch-up annoying. The villain is a villain because they're playing their role well. It can feel like a copout. It can feel like the creators like the villain a lot, and so they no longer want to have them be in the "How can we defeat this Bad Guy?" Role. So to keep a character they like around, they create a new Bad Guy to fill the adversarial role.