[ SECRET POST #6967 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6967 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #995.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

let's be real, the bottom = female role happens no matter how much switching happens. artists drawing taller/thicker characters as thin, waify, and shorter when they bottom? writers describing the bottom as shorter and smaller regardless of canon? yeah that shit is shit but it isn't confined either to switch-prefs or fixed-prefs. in so many fandom situations, regardless of the character dynamic, those fixed roles are rigidly attached to characters for all the gross reasons and not, as OP says, their personal interest, and authors and artists get dogpiled for putting the wrong character on the wrong side of the /. switch, fix, IDGAF as long as your reasoning for the always-bottom isn't "he's 2cm shorter than the top!"

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

I always figured this kind of thing is half to do with size kinks people don't realize they have, or don't realize is a kink at all.