[ SECRET POST #6975 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6975 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Hazbin Hotel]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Star Wars Special: C-3PO (2016)]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #996.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think that outside-the-bedroom characterization and sexual roles HAVE to be written in a way that feels like it correlates or "agrees" or whatever, but I very much agree that, in fiction, it is 100% fine and not weird at all to enjoy or even prefer characterization and sexual roles that are written in a way where one feels (to the writer and/or readers) like it informs the other, or where it feels like there's some kind of coherence between the two.

Obviously topping and bottoming don't have inherent values unto themselves, and can be written in any way that suits the writer. But that means any way that suits the writer, including ways that cater to the kinds of binary dom!top and sub!bottom depictions that some people want to insist are problematic.