case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-02-16 06:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #6982 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6982 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #997.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
I'm neck deep in tagging discourse around other things, and the pushback when you suggest someone tag something that actually is a major trigger (such as graphic child abuse, spousal abuse, etc etc) is insane. Tagging "cis" for canonically cis characters is so mild as to be worthless when you can't even get someone to tag for suicide.

Re: Do you have any squicks?

(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
Someone who isn't going to tag for suicide isn't going to tag for anything though. Those are lost causes whether it's mild or extreme. But someone who writes both trans fic and cis fic who does tag properly can direct you only to those fics, so you don't have to guess and gamble on untagged ones.

I understand you're against the idea though, so I'm going to shrug and drop it here.