Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-02-16 06:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #6982 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6982 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #997.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Do you have any squicks?
(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Do you have any squicks?
(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Do you have any squicks?
(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)and what it seems to imply in reality to lots of other people - which is often cis/cis, but sometimes surprise vaginal that people here are complaining about -
don't seem to match up.
Re: Do you have any squicks?
(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)It's not even a point of surprise vagina although that is something that thankfully is getting better as people push back into place the cultural norm of tagging things that are different than canon.
It's the existence of vaginal anything in M/M in the first place. I love that they're tagging it so I can avoid it but why is it there AT ALL? People who want vaginal stuff can go to M/F or F/F. People who want just dicks only have M/M and even that is getting vagina in it. THAT is the issue. Not tagging.
Re: Do you have any squicks?
(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)"Harry/Draco + cis/cis" would be exactly what you're looking for, and "Harry/Draco + cis/trans" is not what you're looking for. No need to tag their hair color, no need to tag Hermoine who appears in chapter 3 briefly as cis. If a character in a canon is canonically trans but in a ship with a cis person they also fall under "cis/trans" no need to tag them alone as trans, and it's really simple?
M/M, F/F, M/F. Cis/cis, cis/trans, trans/trans. "Cis/cis" and "cis/trans" are both widely popular varieties of slash, popular enough for people who don't like the latter to unfortunately come across all the time and vent about it, so...
But:
"It's the existence of vaginal anything in M/M in the first place. I love that they're tagging it so I can avoid it but why is it there AT ALL? People who want vaginal stuff can go to M/F or F/F. People who want just dicks only have M/M and even that is getting vagina in it. THAT is the issue. Not tagging."
If you're simply morally against trans male fic being considered slash or M/M, that's a whole different thing and you're talking about something completely different than discussing how tags should be used. I wish you had said that at the start so I could not have bothered to make a good faith attempt at the latter.
Re: Do you have any squicks?
(Anonymous) 2026-02-17 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)