[ SECRET POST #6999 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6999 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #999.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well in this secret's example, if there's a website "for M/M doujinshi" and it's never specified what the host mean by that, people who say "it's for M(gender)/M(gender) so cuntboys count" and people who say "it's for M(sex)/M(sex) so cuntboys don't count" both may or may not have valid points, you can't tell.

[(Anonymous)]

I know, but I'm replying to a discussion about all of this stuff being lumped under M/M. The thread strays from the secret, but even then I don't see how "we should add modifiers to terms like M/M" are off-topic from the secret when lumping in uncommon squicks like cuntboys are annoying readers.

[(Anonymous)]

I didn't say anything was offtopic? I'm using the secret as an example of how M/M is being used, and why having that be substituted with alt!M or trans!M doesn't work if the site means M(gender)/M(gender) which it seems to, if cuntboy content is being posted. Cuntboy content being there alongside other things doesn't make it an alt!M site, it's still an M/M (gender) site. What I was trying to say is even if every cuntboy thing were tagged alt!M the issue with the ambiguous term "M/M" remains