case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-03-05 04:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #6999 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6999 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #999.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-05 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Pretty much, there's nuance to it. "I don't like cuntboy stuff" is not transphobic. It can certainly get transphobic if people are going "vaginas do not belong in any male/male story because it's supposed to be about men!"

I just imagine a bunch of actual men with vaginas IRL reading it going "well thanks for that"

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
man with vag here, nope, I'm with OP. I read m/m for dueling dicks, not vag. I don't like mine, can't get rid of it, sure don't want it in my porn.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, I don't know what you're disagreeing with. "I don't want vaginas in the m/m I read" isn't transphobic and I'm not trying to claim it is.

There are people out there literally being like "trans men shouldn't be in m/m because they're not real men" though.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
DA

I've never heard anyone say this. Where are you hearing it?

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
Someone in FS in another thread a month ago or so (?) was like 'vaginas have no place in m/m and should stay out' and I remember that because I was shocked to see that expressed here.

Tbh I have zero issues with people who personally don't want to see it in what they view, but that sort of sweeping generalization is y'know... more than a personal preference.

SA

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
and it was in reference to all types of characters with vaginas, including trans men, not just cuntboys that shouldn't be considered m/m.

Genuinely sorry I can't find it for you, I just spent some time looking but there's a lot of threads to search through. :( Maybe someone else remembers seeing that and can confirm.