case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-03-05 04:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #6999 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6999 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #999.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
Not wanting to fuck a man's vagina doesn't make you transphobic. Implying anyone said so is transphobic and a strawman. Going on about exactly how much you don't want to fuck a man's vagina because all vaginas are gross and how it's your right to never hear about them when you're looking for m/m because that's ~never how it's been before~ is transphobic. It's unnecessary to explain to that degree. Only a small amount of blockable people will call you transphobic for leaving it at "Vaginas aren't my thing." Sorry not all of us are perfect.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
There are people all over this thread calling anyone who doesn't want vaginas in the same category as the non-vagina gay porn transphobic so it's hardly a strawman. Refusing the reality of it all being easier for everyone, trans people included, to have seperate categories or tags for that content because "you're all transphobic if you want this" is also all sorts of questionable, including potentially homophobic for shaming gay people for a sexual preference of their own. The cotton ceiling is incel adjacent crap, and that extends to fandom.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:29 am (UTC)(link)
Literally nobody in this thread is saying that. You're taking what they're saying and reading that sentiment into it yourself.

Which would be hilarious if you are or agree with the anon who told the other trans anon to stop seeing things that aren't there.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Now that's a strawman.

What people said: Hey, M/M has always been just dicks before. We're here for only dicks. There are vaginas in everything else. Can we keep M/M for dicks only?

What you heard: OMG, I never want to fuck your man-gina, that's so gross.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Not beating the transphobia allegations by assuming an anon is trans male, assuming they have a vagina, and calling it a man-gina. You can disagree without doing those things. :\

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:05 am (UTC)(link)
Nayrt
They literally implied they are by saying "it sucks knowing people think your body is unfuckable" in relation to cunts in gay porn so yes, it is a fair assumption.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:10 am (UTC)(link)
So if you think the assumption was correct, the man-gina thing was acceptable to you?

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:12 am (UTC)(link)
No that was unnecessary (though I have seen this, along with girldick in trans spaces so it's not necessarily as offensive as you think) but you also called the reasonable assumption they're AFAB transphobic when that's what they definitely implied.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-06 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
I said all those things, as a whole, were not beating the transphobia allegations, and that they could disagree without doing those things. Even you admit the man-gina thing was unnecessary.

Sometimes people misspeak in anger, I get it, but like. While arguing they're not transphobic is the worst time to do it like that.