case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-03-23 05:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #7017 ]


⌈ Secret Post #7017 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Muppets 2011]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Monarch: Legacy of Monsters]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1001.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2026-03-24 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
DA

I'd say all enemies have some sort of rivalry with each other, but not all rivals are enemies with each other.

But rivalshipping is not only 'rivalry exists'. Rivalshippings means the rivalry is the focal point of the ship, and enemyshipping means being enemies is the focal point of the ship. Enemies to lovers isn't called rivals even when rivalry exists because the point is the enemy part.
iff_and_xor: (Default)

[personal profile] iff_and_xor 2026-03-24 02:17 am (UTC)(link)

Thanks, that makes sense. I definitely agree that two people can technically be both things at once and I’d expect people to use the term that emphasizes the aspect they’re focusing on.