case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2026-05-04 05:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #7059 ]


⌈ Secret Post #7059 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.




__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Gangsta.]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1008.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2026-05-05 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
Yep. I think I would make one exception to this and it's the menswear guy (Derek Guy / [profile] dieworkwear on Twitter), who has turned using someone's own past posts to own them into an art. I think it works for him because his format is purely reactive -- only does it to people who are already starting shit, and he restricts himself to looking just for hypocrisy, so it's not a blanket "you said something problematic one time ever" sort of thing, but more like "it's really funny you're saying x is important, because look at all these times you failed to live up to that."

But yeah, aside from that, I do think people who comb through years of social media activity for one problematic post are generally pretty scary because they have no sense of proportion or scale, and seems like they're only happy if they're tearing someone down.