Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2026-06-06 02:15 pm
[ SECRET POST #1014 ]
⌈ Secret Post #7092 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #1013.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-06 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)Is it a need to participate? To not feel left out in fandom circles? Is it a fear of having work that's seen as 'bad' if you were to do it all by yourself?
Most of fandom works is a passion for the thing they like and maybe getting praised for the craft they took time to make. Do you want to be praised for typing something that gets results or for doing half the work?
Genuinely, what would your ideal response be for contributing AI fanwork?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-06 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)Ai is used in my fandom. I've seen people use it to make insta-slash fic (extra smutty), "high school" year book pictures based on photos of them when they were 25, not the actual photos we have of them as teens, and your garden variety "cute boys fucking each other" pics. Also ai song covers which I think is the worst way to use it in a bandom - but what bandom respects a musician if they're using ai to create text and images of them fucking their bandmates?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-06 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)Or is that something we're not supposed to think about...the moral implications of sexualising male celebrities?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-06 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 03:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 03:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 05:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 10:19 am (UTC)(link)nayrt
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)Just gonna point out, if a law "protects" women from something, but not men?
That implies protection isn't the real purpose of the law.
Re: nayrt
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 12:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2026-06-07 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)