case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2010-02-18 07:40 pm

(no subject)


⌈ Secret Post #1140 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.



Notes:

Some out of order because LJ's being REALLY slow.

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #163.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] fscom.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
118. http://i48.tinypic.com/2d1nzn7.png

(Anonymous) 2010-02-19 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
If it's your comm, why don't you enforce the rules? A passive-aggressive mod is worse than useless.

[identity profile] fairhearing.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
I think OP meant "my" comm figuratively.

Since she specified that this was a multi-fandom problem for her.

So she's probably not a mod at all eleventy billion comms where this happened.

[identity profile] trinity-destler.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
This always seems to happen to me with rare pairings. I get all excited only to find it's really not what I'm looking for.

[identity profile] random00.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Me too OP, me too.

Also, fics without warnings or pairing designation or summaries annoy the hell out of me.

[identity profile] eviinsanemonkey.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm...your icon...so pretty...

[identity profile] random00.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
Why thank you. I'm adoring yours as well. ♥

[identity profile] aeonamber.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, I hate when this happens. Although I don't mind threesomes generally, it's frustrating I'm looking forward to a fic about x/y and it turns out to be unwarned for x/y/x instead. D:

[identity profile] jlh.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
I totally agree. If there's one place you should be able to be unreservedly and openly OTP about your OTP, it's on the ship comm! I especially dislike it when there are OT3 comms in the fandom.

[identity profile] smallearthcat.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
I agree so much. There are some threesomes I'll read, but even so, I want to be aware of what I'm reading going into it. Which is why I tend not to read fic that doesn't list the pairings, but it's sad that there's not much you can do when they just don't tell you. :\

(Anonymous) 2010-02-19 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
*shrug* This sort of thing doesn't really bother me, but then, I tend to be pretty good at scrolling past things and hitting the back button. Just because it's not my OTP doesn't mean it can't be good.

[identity profile] vieillerie.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
As long as it's not SURPRISE THREESOME!!11 I'm fine with it, but I can understand why it bothers other people.
ext_407589: (Default)

[identity profile] 5herlock.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
I grok how this can apply to many different fandoms.
It's unfortunate that when someone mentions this for a specific pairing/threesome, the debate tends to turn against them and everybody's like "You don't like the girl? Mysogynist!" or "You don't like Character Z in your X/Y fic? Well, you can't have X without Z, so too bad!".

[identity profile] boombangbing.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I would hope that that picture had nothing to do with threesomes. :S

[identity profile] rushhour.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
I hate it when that happens to rare pairings. New fic pops up once in a blue moon and I get all giddy, only to discover halfway through that oh, popular character Z is gonna make an appearance and the fic is really all about him.

[identity profile] fadsforwhatever.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
I've got no problem with threesomes, but I can definitely see how it's not your thing. And fics need to be labeled explicitly regarding the pairings they're about.

[identity profile] ryttu3k.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm... ambivalent about this. Yeah, the dynamics of a threesome are... very different to just a single pairing, but on the other hand, I HAVE posted an X/Y/Z fic to a comm for X/Y.

And I justified it because, well, a good part of it WAS X/Y, and also because... that threesome is RARE. Like, I know of two other people in the ENTIRE fandom that ship it, one of whom doesn't do any fanworks for it. And I think a part of me was hoping that I'd get people going, "...Whoa, never thought of that ship any more. That works!" (For what it's worth - both commentors said they loved the ship, but had never posted anything because they didn't know there were any fans for it.)

I don't know... I guess I'm on the fence about it. Some ships just aren't big enough to justify their own comms or anything.

[identity profile] soymade.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
Unless there are no warnings, or threesome fics take over a site dedicated to some rare-pair, I don't even see why this would be a problem.

[identity profile] sableambiguity.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you. OTP, not OT3.

What's worse is the people who think the solution to rival shipping is to throw them all in together. |:

[identity profile] xhelloxghostiex.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 05:56 am (UTC)(link)
That is an adorable dog.

[identity profile] asimaiyat.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't really empathize (since I prefer threesomes to twosomes more or less across the board), but I love the Sad Puppy and want to give him a hug.