[ SECRET POST #133 ]

[shahni.livejournal.com]

⌈ Secret Post #133 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18. [ not!secret ]



Notes:

- Posting for Sonny-Boy! Last day to submit secrets for next week!

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #019.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [1] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Saturday, May 19th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: Here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[grayout.livejournal.com]

Wait... weren't you the one that started it by responding in that way? "lol someone's bitter," I mean... come on.

[advocate.livejournal.com]

Secrets being posted up are due to have somebody respond to them. If someone chose to respond to said comment and wants to start something up, well. Then that's that, unfortunately.

[shahni.livejournal.com]

I know that it could have been worded better, thereby -avoiding- chances of the possible wank (if it were to come), but even then... yeah.

[advocate.livejournal.com]

It's a vicious cycle.

[grayout.livejournal.com]

............ wait so. With that argument someone could post anything, and someone else could be like, "LOLOLOL UR A FUCKING MORON I HOPE U DIE" and... that doesn't count as starting wank? Extremes, but I don't follow the logic.

"Secrets made are due to be posted. If someone chose to respond to said comment and wants to start something up, well. Then that's that, unfortunately."

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah but those who actually fall for that without going lulz over it are kindasorta going for the bait?

sorrylurkingherethisthreadiscool

[advocate.livejournal.com]

I guess that's what I was trying to say. Thank you.

[degrees.livejournal.com]

Wait, people aren't allowed to be offended over something said in response to something they posted? I'm sorry, but that's dumb. Whatever the comments are going for, intentional wank or not, "lulz" should not be the only acceptable response.

JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT IN THE SAME ROOM AS SOMEONE DOES NOT GIVE YOU LICENSE TO BE AN ASSHOLE TO THEM. SCREW "SERIOUS BUSINESS"!

...sorry, I really hate that attitude.

I'm really not insane.

Really.

[grayout.livejournal.com]

No, they're allowed to be offended, but any response besides "lulz" is OBVIOUSLY STUPID.

No one should ever take the internet seriously.

Or they're morons. 8D

[advocate.livejournal.com]

That's also very true! I guess it's just different for everyone.

[(Anonymous)]

Could have fooled me

[degrees.livejournal.com]

*dies* Just because I dislike people writing off things they say on the internet as unimportant because the internet is not serious business and have expressed said opinion in capital letters I'm now insane?

I love it!

Who are you, mystery person, so that I may thank you for showing me the light! :D

[(Anonymous)]

We don't know each other c: but if you're getting so bent out of shape (apparently, I can't tell until you explain) about the fact that some people can make a joke out of silly comments, then maybe you should just step back and calm down? I'm kinda 'lol' at you anyway c: yay caps lock!

[degrees.livejournal.com]

Lol away, I don't care. I'm just tired of seeing people get put down for expressing a dissenting opinion, or saying that they're upset over something someone said because "the internet isn't serious business". This wouldn't have set me off usually, but it's been repeated ad nauseum recently, and I'm tired of people being jerks to each other!

Why can't we get along? Is that so wrong to want?

[(Anonymous)]