case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2011-01-22 04:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #1481 ]


⌈ Secret Post #1481 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________



47.


__________________________________________________



48.


__________________________________________________



49.


__________________________________________________



50.


__________________________________________________



51.


__________________________________________________



52.


__________________________________________________



53.


__________________________________________________



54.


__________________________________________________



55.


__________________________________________________



56.


__________________________________________________



57.


__________________________________________________



58.


__________________________________________________



59.


__________________________________________________



60.


__________________________________________________



61.


__________________________________________________



62.


__________________________________________________



63.


__________________________________________________



64.


__________________________________________________



65.


__________________________________________________



66.


__________________________________________________



67.


__________________________________________________



68.


__________________________________________________



69.


__________________________________________________



70.


__________________________________________________



71.


__________________________________________________



72.



Notes:

Secrets are posted the week after they're submitted.

Secrets Left to Post: 17 pages, 403 secrets from Secret Submission Post #212.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - repeat ], [ 1 - death threat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think everything a woman writes should be about militant feminism, either. But some of the things you said in your list of reasons have very...unfortunate implications that, no matter what kind of fiction you write, you should be aware of:

-Because sometimes I like for things to be plot-driven, and I actually want less emphasis on gender in general.

Why does de-emphasizing gender need to default to "male?" The idea that if you have a woman in the story, that you must shove her vagina in the audience's face because it's the most important thing about her is unsettling at best, and pretty offensive at worst.

-Because in some stories the physicality of women could have implications (possible pregnancy, periods, etc)

Only if you write it that way. You don't have to mention periods just because you have a woman in the story, and a woman does not have to get pregnant in the story unless you want her to. You're the writer, here. You don't need to write about men to avoid these issues, and the implication that women's reproductive cycles are some kind of elephant in the room that you can't ignore is particularly damaging.

-Because it avoids mary-sueish plots, especially with OC's or minor characters.

No, it doesn't. Not by a long shot. It's just as easy to make a male character the uber-perfect sex symbol that can get away with anything and that everyone can't help but admire (or hate out of sheer jealousy of his awesomeness). The idea that only female characters can be nauseatingly perfect is also very, very unfortunate, and even borderline offensive.

-Because I find men sexually attractive, and I sometimes enjoy writing erotically just about the male body (or, two, or more - hence the whole principle of slash).

And if you don't find women sexually attractive, they aren't interesting enough to write about otherwise? I think that's...rather troublesome, on many levels even beyond feminism.

Because I think guys are great, in r/l too - as lovers, friends, teachers etc. I just click with them better, in general.

I'm much the same, but as you said before that you are, in fact, writing fiction, why should this dictate what gender you write about?

I can understand that you just happen to write more about male characters in general. A lot of authors do, myself included, and I'm not saying that you have to write about women equally. But grasping at borderline misogynist straws like this is only proving the secret poster's point. In this case, I think the better answer to "why do you write about men all the time?" would be a simple "because I just do."

[identity profile] kallanda-lee.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
Because sometimes I like for things to be plot-driven, and I actually want less emphasis on gender in general.

Why does de-emphasizing gender need to default to "male?" The idea that if you have a woman in the story, that you must shove her vagina in the audience's face because it's the most important thing about her is unsettling at best, and pretty offensive at worst.

Sure, they can be, and I have written women that way (in say, something like Criminal Minds or series that are actually a lot about plot). It's more about the dynamic of the characters there. If you are writing fanfic, then there is canon. In canon there is often sexual tension, or established relationships. Sometimes I wish to skip that all-together. And As I mentioned to other posters, I dislike writing occ, so ignoring it does not work. So I might choose to write certain scenes without a character in it. In this case, I'll highlight characters I like. And they're often male.


Because in some stories the physicality of women could have implications (possible pregnancy, periods, etc)

Only if you write it that way. You don't have to mention periods just because you have a woman in the story, and a woman does not have to get pregnant in the story unless you want her to. You're the writer, here. You don't need to write about men to avoid these issues, and the implication that women's reproductive cycles are some kind of elephant in the room that you can't ignore is particularly damaging.

No, but OP mentioned slash and this is specifically a thought about sex scenes. Fact is, if a man and a woman have sex, pregnancy can result. In pretty much any universe. And sometimes I just do not like touching on that subject, even if it is just in my mind. Between two men it can't. Nor can it between two women, but I usually have very little interest in writing sex scenes between two women. For the rather simple reason that I also write fic for my pleasure, not just the readers . It's not like it's a novel I'm trying to sell.

Because it avoids mary-sueish plots, especially with OC's or minor characters.

Please see reply to hanachan01.

-Because I find men sexually attractive, and I sometimes enjoy writing erotically just about the male body (or, two, or more - hence the whole principle of slash).
And if you don't find women sexually attractive, they aren't interesting enough to write about otherwise? I think that's...rather troublesome, on many levels even beyond feminism.

If I write slash that is mostly masturbatory material, then it hardly is about how interesting a woman is...in that particular scene she's a third wheel, not an asset, unless I'd be specifically writing an MMF threesome, which can be hot as hell (there's an idea to do), but is a different dynamic. Just like when guys look at lesbian porn, the appeal of it is that there's no man in there. Same for slash. Only the other way around. Also, same like I wouldn't want a third party for an OTP het pairing of mine, either. And unless it's a long, elaborate story, I do not see the need for any important side characters in general .


Because I think guys are great, in r/l too - as lovers, friends, teachers etc. I just click with them better, in general. (

I'm much the same, but as you said before that you are, in fact, writing fiction, why should this dictate what gender you write about?

Because this is not actually a novel I'm trying to publish. It's about the characters I like, for the people who like them, and I do not have anything to prove, not am I pushing a political agenda.

I replied elaborately, because someone who seemed to e genuinely interested wanted to know. Otherwise yes, mostly I just write guys because I like to .

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
"Sexual tension" is also very subjective; even if the creators of the canon intend for it to be there, you can ignore it if you want. Example: AtLA. There was obviously supposed to be romantic tension between Aang and Katara, yet half the fandom sees them as a mother-son type of relationship instead.

Fact is, if a man and a woman have sex, pregnancy can result. In pretty much any universe. And sometimes I just do not like touching on that subject, even if it is just in my mind.

In the real world, sure. But as you have said, this is fiction. Even when I write het sex, the idea of pregnancy never crosses my mind unless I've decided it's a future plot point.

Please see reply to hanachan01

Putting more work and effort into a character, especially if you identify with them, is actually what avoids creating a Mary Sue, because you're fleshing the character out into something human and flawed and relateable instead of the idealized, chiseled perfection you wish you could be (which is what a Mary Sue is). And even if that wasn't the case...you identify more with male characters. By your argument, shouldn't your writing male characters mean they're more likely to be Sue-ish, not less?

Like I said, it would have been better for you to just say "because I like to." You're just digging yourself a deeper hole, here.

(Anonymous) 2011-01-23 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
Why are you trying to reason with this idiot? She's a rape apologist.

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
...What the hell is a "rape apologist?" Or do I not even want to know?

DA

(Anonymous) 2011-01-23 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
take a look at this thread (http://community.livejournal.com/fandomsecrets/616542.html?thread=387479390#t387479390), or this one (http://community.livejournal.com/fandomsecrets/616542.html?thread=387316062#t387316062). just examples.

Re: DA

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I...HOLY SHIT

I'm sorry I ever bothered. What a fucking nutcase, and way to be exactly what this secret was talking about. Jesus Ice-Skating Christ.

[identity profile] judo-creature.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
... oh. Oh my stars. I just looked at that first thread. I... oh.

[identity profile] judo-creature.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I googled it and this is what the first link said. (http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/feed-the-faq-rape-apologist-definitions-clarifications-and-links/)

But I would summarize it as "WON'T YOU PLEASE THINK OF THE POOR MENS?" Or just "the poor rapist" since female rapists are pardoned all the time because ~lol a woman can't rape anyone.

[identity profile] kallanda-lee.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)
You're still assuming I somehow need to defend myself. Someone asked my reasons, I stated them, and I stand by them. Clearly you do not like them, and clearly you were not the target audience for the reply.

I have no problem with preferring men in fiction (either as a reader or a writer), nor do I feel an obligation to write more women (and I do actually write them, one of my longest going fics has a strong female character). But I do not write them because of some political agenda, for the sake of feminism, but because I like that character. If I find women in a certain fandom whiny, I'm not going to write them.

Fact it, if I write, certain things do cross my mind, and diminish my enjoyment, as a writer. You can disregard a character's personality, but I dislike doing that. If I were to write say Quinn, from Glee...well, we know from experience she is prone to not use contraceptives...in fact, I don't really trust any of those girls to be too smart about it. So I'd rather not write it at all.

If you had read my full response, I consider putting more character development into one female character than in all other characters Mary-Sueish, yes. I see it happen in fanfic a lot. Developing all characters is of course a good thing.

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2011-01-23 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I consider putting more character development into one female character than in all other characters Mary-Sueish, yes.

Then I'm glad I don't read your fics, because if you don't realize how utterly stupid that is, you have no business calling yourself a writer.

And having read not only your reasons, but some other threads people have linked to that you were in? No, I think the reason you don't write about women is because you really are a misogynist, and exactly the kind of person this secret was aimed at. Get the hell out of my gender, please.

[identity profile] kallanda-lee.livejournal.com 2011-01-24 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Get the hell out of my gender, please.

You realize that that's physically improbable, right?

Also nice how you see someone who does not agree with you on stances over gender and femininity to be unfit to be a part of your gender...

[identity profile] dorknessrising.livejournal.com 2011-01-24 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
No, I think you're unfit to be part of my gender when you go defending rapists, blaming victims, and invalidating the experience of others because it isn't 100% identical to your idiotically narrow definition of "rape."

Hell, you're unfit to be part of my species, because you're a thoroughly disgusting excuse for a human being.

[identity profile] kallanda-lee.livejournal.com 2011-01-24 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
I spontaneously feel like bursting into singing "can you feel the love tonight?"

Unfortunately for you, I'm not planning on dying anytime soon.